Research software is an enabler: most of today’s research relies on it to analyse data, a cornerstone of scientific output. While the majority of researchers say that their work wouldn’t be possible without the use of software, its critical role in the science community has traditionally gone unrecognised. The Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) Eureka Prize for Excellence in Research Software represents a significant step toward making these efforts more visible. We sat down with Rosie Hicks, Chief Executive Officer of the ARDC, to unpack the latest addition to the Eureka Prizes program.


Headshot of woman in blue dress against white background

Rosie Hicks is the CEO of Australian Research Data Commons, Australia’s peak body for research data and sponsor of the Eureka Prize for Excellence in Research Software.

Image: Australian Research Data Commons
© Australian Research Data Commons

Can you tell us a bit about the Australian Research Data Commons’ purpose and mission?

The ARDC accelerates research and innovation by driving excellence in the creation, analysis and retention of high-quality data assets. We partner with the research community and industry to build leading-edge digital research infrastructure that provides Australian researchers with competitive advantage through data. The ARDC is funded by the Australian Government’s National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS).


What role does research software play in the science community?

Those working on the frontiers of research need highly specialised software to create, handle and analyse data, and therefore rely on it. Despite being an increasingly essential element in the scholarly research infrastructure ecosystem, this software is often invisible. Not only does it go uncited in journal papers, but the researchers who create and maintain it are rarely recognised for their time and effort. Because software requires a rare combination of deep research knowledge and technical competency to be produced, this is where the software originates. Traditional research, however, incentivises the production of academic papers, not software.


Those working on the frontiers of research need highly specialised software to create, handle and analyse data ...

Sometimes innovation in software lies within the development of new methodologies, and this is when entirely new approaches to our understanding of the world are captured as software. For instance, time series analysis occurs in a very broad array of fields, from economic forecasting to speech signal processing. How this is done emerges from research through the creation of new methods, and these methods are made usable through software. When new methods and models are more broadly accepted, they start to enter research and services that impact on our everyday lives. With the increase in available data, as well as the computing power to analyse it, the need for robust and applicable software in research has also increased.


Unlike peer reviewed papers, high-quality research software allows researchers to actually use the specialised methods and models that are described in the papers. This is why the ARDC has established a national agenda to recognise software as a first-class research output. We consulted widely with Australia’s research sector to produce the agenda and now we’re working collaboratively to deliver it.


The Eureka Prize for Excellence in Research Software is awarded for a contribution to develop, maintain or extend software that has enabled significant new scientific research. Tell us more about the prize purpose.

This award will recognise the role of developing and maintaining software as a critical part of research and innovation in Australia. Many researchers realise that they can’t conduct modern research without this valuable tool and admit that its existence has greatly accelerated their work. While some of the most cited papers of all time describe computational methods and models, the practice of formally acknowledging the software used to produce research is not yet common or consistent. Recognising its value is, however, critical for its sustainability.


AstroPy is an example of an open-source research software project with contributors from all around the world. Photo credit: NASA

AstroPy is an example of an open-source research software project with contributors from all around the world

Image: NASA
rTZW4f02zY8

Software for research is often built under the leadership of experienced senior researchers, but those at early and mid-career stages undertake the labour. An effort might consist of a combination of senior leaders and a small team, who work over many years to build robust software for broad consumption by a range of users. It could be a series of contributions by Australia-based researchers to larger efforts such as AstroPy, where expertise is folded into one component of an international effort. Or it may be the work of one individual over many years, using their knowledge to keep highly specialised software running for the research community’s use.


The Eureka Prize for Excellence in Research Software will celebrate both the leadership and effort that underpins this work. We see it as an opportunity to recognise what most at the coalface of modern research already know: that we can’t undertake innovative new research without the ongoing availability, stability, robustness and integrity of this software.


The Eureka Prize for Excellence in Research Software represents an opportunity to acknowledge the value of many different contributions

Who might consider entering this prize?

Leaders of team efforts to produce — and especially maintain — software upon which research depends are invited to apply for this prize, as are developers, maintainers and contributors. Entries from both individuals and small teams are eligible, and where a project has been sustained over many years by successive contributions (from post-doctoral researchers, for instance) we urge teams to recognise this succession of contributions in their entry.


Some open-source projects in research like AstroPy or Scikit-learn are enormous, with contributors from all over the world, and individuals in Australia who are involved in these collective efforts are encouraged to submit activity that represents their role. Those in both academic and other professional positions who have contributed to applicable projects are eligible to enter. So, if a highly specialised scientist has acquired software development skills, or a skilled software engineer has come to work closely with scientists to produce a program, they might consider submitting an entry.


Most software in research is developed as open-source, but some efforts are closed-source commercial software — projects that employ either mode of sustainability are welcome to enter. Research is not the exclusive domain of academia, either: there are, for example, some fantastic efforts used to deliver citizen science projects, which deserve wider recognition


If you are a researcher that depends on software for your work, take a moment to explore where and how it is both developed and maintained. Should you find that this effort (in full or part) is based in Australia, consider either nominating the developers directly or contacting the authors to suggest they submit an entry. Software is such a pervasive part of modern life that we don’t often stop to think about where it comes from, the incredible work that goes into its development or the continued effort required to keep it working.


The Eureka Prize for Excellence in Research Software represents an opportunity to acknowledge the value of many different contributions!


Two men outdoors in exercise gear wearing facemasks

It’s because of research software that we’ve been able to understand and predict the spread of the COVID-19 and estimate the impact measures to constrain it.

Image: Kate Trifo
GTHeV-FF

What are some of the practical impacts that the broader community might observe in their day to day lives due to these developments?

Consider the coronavirus pandemic, which has had a profound impact on daily life. It’s because of research software that we’ve been able to understand and predict the spread of the disease and estimate the impact measures to constrain it. This involves bringing together large data collections and then constructing models to analyse them. Tracking changes to the genetic code of viruses requires special software to analyse enormous amounts of data in order to measure the distance between variants as they develop. These activities all need to be carried out both robustly, at a high speed, and at scale. Similarly, understanding how the climate changes over time involves sophisticated modelling of several observable phenomena with enormous amounts of data.


Research software is a uniquely useful way to share knowledge.

Group of people seated around table in a meeting room

The ARDC's Dr Tom Honeyman discusses research software at the International Funders Workshop: The Future of Research Software, hosted by the Research Software Alliance (ReSA) and the Netherlands Science Center in November 2022.

Image: Annelies Verhelst/Netherlands eScience Center
© Annelies Verhelst/Netherlands eScience Center

What excites you most about this field of science?

Research software is a uniquely useful way to share knowledge. When a researcher lays down their ideas as software, they are unlocking it for more widespread use and when developed openly, another researcher can come in and see precisely how they are expressing their ideas. This is such a different way of working than through academic journal papers. We see it as a broader change in the way that modern research is occurring and are excited to help accelerate this transformation.


Entries to the 2023 Australian Research Data Commons Eureka Prize for Excellence in Research Software will open on Monday 13 February.